This page is home to entries on individuals, rather than groups. Here's a Character Template to make life easier when creating new entries. When creating new entries, add them in their alphabetical and relationship position on the list (and please remember, alphabetize by last name (where appropriate) and do not include "the" in alphabetizing).
Considering how crowded this page is getting, should we move all the organization info into the "Organizations" page? We could make this page a simple alphabetical list of characters (with a short descriptive sentence after each one).
I don't really feel this is too crowded. It's an index, really, and as such is invariably going to be somewhat long. The table of contents and organization of it make it easy to find things. A straight alphabetical list has less overall utility, I think, not to mention being less user-friendly. There's no particular reason we couldn't have both, of course, perhaps with the alphabetical index as a link off this page.
Sure, but if you're looking for a particular character, it would be easier to find them with an alphabetical list. If you're looking for someone within an organization, you would go to the organization page to find them.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.
Comments (4)
Michael Babish said
at 10:21 am on Aug 2, 2006
I removed the double-spacing, since this page was getting a bit crowded.
Michael Babish said
at 12:57 pm on Aug 9, 2006
Considering how crowded this page is getting, should we move all the organization info into the "Organizations" page? We could make this page a simple alphabetical list of characters (with a short descriptive sentence after each one).
Joshua Moretto said
at 4:48 pm on Aug 11, 2006
I don't really feel this is too crowded. It's an index, really, and as such is invariably going to be somewhat long. The table of contents and organization of it make it easy to find things. A straight alphabetical list has less overall utility, I think, not to mention being less user-friendly. There's no particular reason we couldn't have both, of course, perhaps with the alphabetical index as a link off this page.
Michael Babish said
at 10:49 pm on Aug 11, 2006
Sure, but if you're looking for a particular character, it would be easier to find them with an alphabetical list. If you're looking for someone within an organization, you would go to the organization page to find them.
You don't have permission to comment on this page.